CALIFORNIA State Health Assessment Core Module
2022 Update

Reporting data through 2020

0 Introduction

This annual State Health Assessment (SHA) Core Module provides a snapshot of the health status for the entire California population. The Module is based upon a set of standard inputs, produced using an automated system, to assess population health across a range of health conditions, demographic characteristics, and other factors (e.g., disparities and inequities). The Module is used to identify key findings that contribute to informing the State Health Improvement Plan.

A range of data are used in this Core Module including data on deaths, hospitalizations, reportable diseases, emergency department visits, years lived with disability, social determinants of health, and population denominator sizes. Multiple types of data are essential for describing the state of health of the California population.

A majority of the charts and tables in this module are based on death data. Death data are a high quality, geographically and demographically granular, and consistent data source. Death data allow for objective comparisons over time and between groups, using a solid indicator of a hard outcome. The California Burden of Disease Condition List allows for investigation on a wide range of causes of death grouped into conditions related to clear clinical and clear public health programmatic areas.

There are certainly many conditions that have tremendous population health impact, such as mental health conditions, back and neck pain, and multiple sclerosis, which do not directly cause death. These are addressed to the degree possible with other measures (e.g. hospitalization, years lived with disability). There are also some very commonly occurring conditions, like sexually transmitted diseases, which rarely cause death or disability—some of these are reflected in the measure of reportable diseases.

As a key annual milestone in the ongoing State Health Assessment process, the Core Module provides a standard set of measures for comparative analysis. While maintaining this consistency, enhancements are incorporated each year along with relevant data sources as they become available. Additional detail and tools for further exploration of data are available through the California Community Burden of Disease System (CCB) and the Let’s Get Healthy California website.

2 Rankings of Leading Causes

2.1 Multiple Lenses - Top 5 Conditions based on Multiple Measures, 2020

  • This multi-chart emphasizes that there are many ways to view the health status of Californians, and that public health looks across multiple measures to identify public health challenges.

    The first four charts use measures relating to deaths (number, years of life lost (YLL), increase, and race/ethnicity disparity). The next four charts look at additional lenses of public health burden (hospitalizations, ED visits, reportable diseases, and disability). County-level versions of this same multi-chart and a downloadable document can be found here.

  • Many conditions appear on more than one of these ranking measures, even though the measures assess very different levels of burden or impact:

    Ischemic heart disease is 1st in terms of numbers of deaths in 2020 and 3rd in terms of Years of Life Lost (YLL).

    Drugs overdoses are 1st for YLL, 1st for increases from 2010 to 2020, 5th in terms of a racial/ethnic disparity, and 4th in terms of Years Lived with Disability.

    Alcohol-related conditions are 5th for YLL and 2nd in terms of racial/ethnic disparity.

    Mental health conditions rank 3rd for numbers of hospitalizations and 2nd for Years Lived with Disability.

    Additional detail on key findings for these measures are addressed in later sections.

*Conditions with fewer than 100 deaths in either period are excluded. Such conditions with large percent increases include:
Influenza: 991.1% increase in age-adjusted death rate from 2010 (49 deaths) to 2020 (658 deaths)
Poisonings (non-drug): 75.2% increase in age-adjusted death rate from 2010 (68 deaths) to 2020 (127 deaths)

2.2 Broad Condition Groups (5) - Rankings of Number of Deaths and Years of Life Lost in 2020

  • This set of charts compares all causes of death using five broad condition groupings. These broad groupings are important for a very high-level understanding of the burden of death/disease, and these groupings (indicated by color) are used to frame the data in many of the charts that follow.

    The top chart ranks the number of deaths in California in 2020 according to the five broad condition groupings. The bottom chart shows the ranking of Years of Life Lost according to the five broad condition groupings. Years of Life Lost weights conditions that impact younger people and is sometimes referred to as “premature death”.

  • Cardiovascular Diseases caused the most deaths in 2020, followed closely by Other Chronic Disease . The Cardiovascular Disease broad condition group includes ischemic heart disease, stroke, hypertensive heart disease, and others.

    The Other Chronic disease broad condition grouping includes Alzheimer’s disease, cirrhosis (non-alcohol), COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), kidney disease, and others.

    Injuries caused by far the most years of life lost in 2020. This broad condition group includes drug overdose, alcohol-related conditions (including alcohol-related cirrhosis), suicide, homicide, falls, and road injury.

    For detail on the number of deaths due to specific conditions within each broad condition group please see Appendix chart A.5.

2.3 Public Health Condition Groupings - Top 15 Number of Deaths in 2020

  • These charts show a more detailed view of causes, disaggregated into what we call the Public Health Level groupings. This grouping is based on programmatic areas of public health and/or clinical aspects of the conditions, to facilitate public health planning and action.

    This chart shows the ranking of the top 15 causes based on numbers of deaths.

  • At this Public Health Level, the conditions contributing the most deaths are ischemic heart disease, COVID-19 and Alzheimer’s disease. Note that four of the top seven causes of death are in the Cardiovascular broad group.

    COVID-19 emerged in 2020 contributing the only ranked cause in the Communicable disease broad condition group.

2.4 Public Health Condition Groups - Top 15 Years of Life Lost in 2020

  • This chart shows the ranking of the top 15 Public Health Level causes for years of life lost.

  • The top contributors to years of life lost are drug overdose, COVID-19, and ischemic heart disease. Note that five of the top seven causes of years of life lost are in the Injury broad grouping.

    In 2019, drug overdose deaths overtook ischemic heart disease as the top cause of years of life lost and remained so in 2020. This was the first time any cause ranked higher than ischemic heart disease for at least two decades. Due to the magnitude of deaths from ischemic heart disease, it has been a leading cause both in terms of numbers and years of life lost for the past 20 years.

2.5 Public Health Condition Groups - Top 15 based on 10-year and 1-year Increases

  • This chart shows the ranking of the top 15 Public Health Level causes based on percent increase in rates from 2009 to 2019 and from 2019 to 2020. A detailed data table with these increases is included in Appendix B.1

  • Deaths from drug overdoses increased more than any other condition both from 2009 to 2019 and from 2019 to 2020.

    Kidney disease ranked 2nd in terms of increases in deaths from 2009 to 2019, and ranked 11th from 2019 to 2020.

    From 2019 to 2020, homicide was ranked 2nd in terms of increases in deaths, diabetes 3rd, influenza 4th, alcohol-related conditions 5th, and asthma 6th. Of these five conditions, only alcohol-related ranked in the top 15 increases from 2009 to 2019. These recent increases are concerning and need further exploration, including their relationships to the pandemic.

    Other conditions that ranked in the top 15 in both time periods include: Alzheimer’s disease, hypertensive heart disease, road injury and endocrine/blood/immune disorders.

*Conditions with fewer than 100 deaths in any period (2009, 2019, 2020) are excluded. Such conditions with large percent increases include:
Poisonings (non-drug): 31.22% increase in age-adjusted death rate from 2010 (71 deaths) to 2020 (100 deaths)
Sickle cell disorders and trait: 73.08% increase in age-adjusted death rate from 2019 (16 deaths) to 2020 (29 deaths)
Poisonings (non-drug): 25.25% increase in age-adjusted death rate from 2019 (100 deaths) to 2020 (127 deaths)

4 Preliminary Data - 2021

4.1 2021 PRELIMINARY DATA: All-Cause Mortality, Monthly Trend, 2017-2021

  • Due to the urgency of sharing COVID-19 related information, this section includes preliminary 2021 data, which were received in mid-April 2022.

    This chart shows monthly all-cause mortality trends for each of the past five years.

  • All-cause mortality rates began increasing in April 2020 relative to the same months in the prior four years, and were high throughout 2020 and into the fall of 2021. The decrease in September 2020 reflects decreases in COVID-19 deaths after the first surge. The rate peaked in January of 2021 with the second surge, then decreased in the 2nd quarter of 2021 to pre-covid levels, and began increasing again in the 3rd quarter of 2021, with the surge from “delta variant”.

4.3 2021 PRELIMINARY DATA: All-Cause Mortality Quarterly Trend by Race/Ethnicity and Year Group (2017-2019 vs 2020-2021)

  • This chart shows, for race/ethnicity groups, all-cause age-adjusted quarterly mortality rates, for 2020 and through Q4 of 2021, and for the 2017-2019 average.

  • All-cause death rates for all populations increased compared to prior years in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quarters of 2020 and the 1st quarter of 2021.

    Rates decreased for all groups in the 2nd quarter of 2021, and increased for all groups in the 3rd quarter of 2021.



    Assessment of these increases in excess mortality are carefully reviewed in Data Brief: 2020 Increases in Deaths in California.

4.4 2021 PRELIMINARY DATA: Top 5 Causes of Death and Years of Life Lost in 2021

  • This chart shows leading causes of death and the leading causes of years of life lost in 2021.

  • COVID-19 was the leading cause of both deaths and years of life lost in 2021.

    These are the same top five ranking conditions as 2020 (shown in section 2.1), and the order is the same, except that COVID-19 is the top ranking condition so far in 2021, whereas it was 2nd in 2020 for both deaths and years of life lost.

5 Specific focus: Populations

5.1 Race/Ethnicity Age-Specific All-Cause Death Rate Ratio with Whites as Referent Group, 2018-2020

  • This chart shows the ratio of age-specific American Indian/Alaskan Native (AI/AN), Asian, Black, Latino, and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (NHPI) rates to the corresponding age-specific White rates (Whites are used as the reference group since they have historically been the largest group in the State, and are, on average, relatively advantaged).

    A rate ratio of 1.0 means that the rates are the same for both groups.

    Appendix Table B.2 shows the numbers of deaths, population sizes, and rates that are the basis for the rate ratios in the chart.

  • Of the many observations that can be seen in this chart, one especially important observation is seen in the “Black:White” rate ratio column. In the 0-4 year old age group the death rate is over 3 times higher for Black infants/toddlers than for Whites. For children/teens/early 20’s and 35-44 age group the rates are over 2 times higher for Blacks than Whites. In general, this ratio decreases as age increases and among the oldest age group the rate among Blacks is less than the rate among Whites.

    Many complex factors interweave to create these disparities and patterns. The much higher rate of death among Black 0-4 year olds is due to the cascade of social determinants of health and structural inequities.

    Among the Latino population, rates are better (lower) than Whites for ages 25 and older, but worse (higher) between ages 0 and 24, with the greatest difference at the youngest (0-4) age level.

    Among AI/AN and NHPI, the patterns are similar to the pattern described for Blacks, and important for the same reasons. Because of the much smaller population sizes of these two groups, there is more variability in the numbers.

  • The black line at the end of each bar is the 95% confidence interval for the rate ratio, calculated with the rateratio function of the epitools package in R.

*Data are suppressed per the California Health and Human Services Agency Data De-Identification Guidelines

5.2 Change in Race/Ethnicity All-Cause Mortality Rate Disparity, 2000-2020

  • This chart shows changes over time in the rate ratio of the other race/ethnic groups compared to White. It shows increasing differences from the White rate for all groups starting in the mid-2010’s, with a sharp acceleration in these disparities in 2020, because of the impact of COVID-19. (The chart in section 1.3a serves as important background for this chart.)

5.3 Ranking of Race/Ethnic Disparities in Death Rate, 2018-2020

  • This chart ranks causes of death by racial/ethnic disparities. Disparities are measured using rate ratios, comparing, the rate among the race/ethnic group with the highest rate to the rate among the race/ethnic group with the lowest rate for each cause of death. Data for 2018-2020 are combined for statistical stability.

    A rate ratio near one means there is little difference between the groups with the highest and lowest rates.The bar size shows the rate ratio; the labels inside the bar show the group with the highest rate and the lowest rate (highest:lowest) for that cause.

  • The two highest ranking disparities in death rates are for homicide and HIV/STDs, both with the Black rate well over 10 times the rate among Asians.

    The next highest disparity is for Alcohol-related conditions, with American Indian/Alaska Natives having rates well over 10 times the rate among Asians. The fourth highest disparity is for tuberculosis, with Asians having rates more than 10 times those among Whites. (The high rate among Asians in California is known to be associated with persons born outside of the United States. Report on Tuberculosis in California, 2019).

5.4a Top Ranking Causes of Deaths, Hospitalization, and ED Visits for Californians, Age 15-24

  • This set of charts shows the leading causes of Deaths, Hospitalizations and Emergency Department (ED) visits for a selected age group at different stages of the life course using data from 2018 to 2020 combined.

    These age groups have been selected to highlight different patterns in causes of death, Hospitalizations, and ED Visits at each stage.

    Additional age groups, race/ethnicity and county level views for these same ranked data can be seen in the California Community Burden of Disease Engine (CCB) in the “Ranks” section, in the “DEATH HOSP ED” Tab.

  • This first chart is for the 15-24 year old age group, and shows that five of the top six causes of death and many of the top causes of ED visits, are injury-related. The top causes of hospitalization are mental health and perinatal-related. Road injury, drug overdose, homicide, and suicide are by far the leading causes of death in the age group.

5.4b Top Ranking Causes of Deaths, Hospitalization, and ED Visits for Californians, Age 45-54

  • This next chart is for the 45-54 year old age group, and shows the leading causes of death include Cardiovascular, Injury (in particular drug overdoses and alcohol-related), Other Chronic (cirrhosis) and COVID-19; septicemia is leading cause of hospitalization in this group (and in many of the older age-groups), and three of the top five causes of hospitalization are mental health related; ED visits are due to a wide range of conditions.

5.4c Top Ranking Causes of Deaths, Hospitalization, and ED Visits for Californians, Age 85+

  • This third chart is for the 85+ age group and indicates that in this 2008-2020 time period Alzheimer’s disease is the leading cause of death and that Cardiovascular Diseases are the next five leading causes.

    Septicemia is the leading cause of hospitalization; other leading causes include Cardiovascular Diseases, fractures, pneumonia, and urinary tract infections.

    Urinary tract infections are also the second leading cause of ED visits; three of the top five causes, including the top cause, are Injuries.

5.5a Top Ranking Causes by Death Rate

  • These next three charts look at deaths, hospitalizations, and ED visit data by race/ethnicity; showing all race groups, with the ranks sorted based on one selected race group.

    These same charts, and for all age groups, for all California counties are also available in the California Community Burden of Disease Engine (CCB) in the “Ranks” section, in the “AGE RACE FOCUS” Tab.

  • This chart is for Deaths, ordered based on rates among American Indian/Alaska Natives, and indicates that the 2nd and 3rd leading causes of deaths among American Indian/Alaska Natives are drug overdoses and alcohol-related conditions. These two causes of death do not rank among even the top six causes of death for any other race/ethnic group

5.5b Top Ranking Causes by Hospitalization Rate

  • This chart is for Hospitalizations, ordered based on rates among Blacks, and indicates that the leading cause of hospitalization for Blacks is septicemia and that the second and fourth leading causes are mental health related.

    The chart indicates that this is not the same ordering for all other race/ethnic groups. For example, among both Asians and Latinos “Other Complications of Birth” is the second leading cause of hospitalization, but only the eighth leading cause among Blacks.

5.5c Top Ranking Causes by Emergency Department Rate

  • This chart is for Emergency Visits ordered based on rates among Blacks, and indicates that for Blacks, and all race/ethnic groups, abdominal pain, chest pain, and upper respiratory infections are leading causes for ED visits.

6 Risk Factors/Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME)

6.1 Risk Factors Associated with the Largest Number of YEARS LIVED WITH DISABILITY, 1990 and 2019

  • These two charts present information about the risk factors associated with causes of death and disability. They are based on complex model estimates from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. They provide information for prioritizing public health resources and action based on assessing the prevalence of a wide range of behavioral and environmental risk factors, and the associations of these factors with specific conditions. These associations are modeled based on the three outcomes of deaths, years lived with disability, and disability adjusted life years.

    The most recent data available are from 2019.

  • This chart shows that in 2019 many of the top 10, including the top two, leading risk factors associated with the greatest number of Years Lived with Disability are related to obesity, healthy eating, and exercise.

    Tobacco was the leading cause of Years Lived with Disability in 1990, but has dropped to the third leading risk factor in 2019, due in large part to effective public health programs over the last many years.

6.2 Risk Factors Associated with the Largest Number of DEATHS, 1990 and 2019

  • Similarly, the top risk factor, and five of the top six, associated with numbers of deaths are related to heathy eating, exercise, and other factors associated with obesity and high-blood pressure. Again, tobacco has decreased from being the leading risk factor contributing to deaths to the second leading cause.From 1990 to 2019, drug use increased three positions in rank (from 13th to 10th) and Alcohol use increased two (10th to 8th), among risk factors for death. Encouragingly, Unsafe sex dropped four (from 12th to 16th) and Air pollution dropped three (from 8th to 11th).

8 Social Determinants of Health and Place

  • This section provides selected examples describing the associations of two Social Determinants of Health with the overall health outcomes of life expectancy, using the lens of place.

    The two selected social determinants are 1) community-level poverty rates (percent of community <150% of Federal poverty level) and 2) community-level educational attainment (percent of community with high-school education or less). These data are from the American Community Survey, using 5-year data, 2015-2019.

    The unit of measure is ‘places’ rather than ‘persons’, as we compare the social determinant and health outcome context for these communities, grouped into quartiles. For the first chart and the table we look at the geographic level of community, based on California Department of Health Care Access and Information (HCAI) Medical Service Study Areas (MSSAs); aggregations of census tracts.

    The section lays the foundation for a wide range of more in-depth exploration of these associations, including for specific causes of death, for additional social determinants, for specific demographic groups, for multiple geographies, and over time.

8.1 Life Expectancy (Mean) by Quartiles of Community Poverty and Community Educational Attainment, 2016-2020

  • These charts show the mean community life expectancy based on quartiles of community poverty and educational attainment.

  • Average life expectancy increases as poverty decreases and average life expectancy increases at as education increases. Increased life expectancy is associated with lower rates of poverty and higher rates of education.

  • The red slashes at the bottom of the y-axis indicate that the scale of the y-axis is discontinuous. The y-axis does not start at 0, but rather at age 65, so that the important differences in life expectancy can be seen clearly.

8.2 Communities with highest and lowest life expectancy, 2016-2020

  • This table shows the communities (MSSAs) with the 10 highest and lowest levels of life expectancy in the State. It also presents the mortality rate, percent living in poverty and percent with educational attainment of high school graduation and below, as well as overall population.

  • This tabular view of the data highlights the strong community-level associations seen above, and emphasizes some extreme differences in life expectancy. The life expectancy in the “Clearlake /Clearlake Oaks” community in Lake County, with high levels of poverty and lower levels of education at 72.3 is about 16 years less than the life expectancy of 88.1 in the very advantaged community of “Bel Air /Beverly Glen /Beverly Hills /etc.” in Los Angeles County.

County MSSA Life Expectancy Adjusted Death Rate # of deaths Poverty HS Grad and Below Population
Top 10 MSSAs based on Life Expectancy
Los Angeles Bel Air /Beverly Glen /Beverly Hills /Brentwood /Malibu /Pacific Palisades /Santa Monica Northwest /Topanga 88.1 375.4 3,443 7.7% 9.0% 94,707
Santa Clara Los Altos /Los Altos Hills /Palo Alto Central /Stanford 87.4 398.6 4,436 7.9% 5.9% 127,584
Santa Clara Cupertino /Rancho Rinconada /San Jose West /Saratoga 87.4 388.8 3,219 7.0% 8.3% 113,460
San Mateo El Granada /Half Moon Bay /Miramar /Montara /Moss Beach /Princeton by the Sea /Skyline 87.2 422.4 737 9.4% 23.7% 26,795
Los Angeles Century City /Cheviot Hills /Rancho Park /West Los Angeles /Westwood 87.2 408.9 4,088 20.2% 11.0% 121,141
San Mateo Atherton /Lindenwood /Menlo Oaks /Menlo Park /Redwood City Central /Sharon Heights /West Menlo Park /Woodside /Woodside Hills 87.0 421.6 2,624 9.6% 14.5% 88,713
Orange Laguna Beach /Laguna Woods 86.8 429.1 4,689 14.7% 20.5% 82,744
Contra Costa Alamo /Danville /Diablo /San Ramon 86.8 412.0 3,325 5.2% 10.9% 144,175
Alameda Fremont South /Mission San Jose /Newark South /Warm Springs 86.6 409.0 2,041 5.6% 23.2% 99,176
San Francisco Golden Gate Park /Parkside /Sunset /West Portal 86.6 425.6 2,929 10.1% 21.8% 84,081
Bottom 10 MSSAs based on Life Expectancy
San Bernardino Highland /San Bernardino East 74.6 998.5 4,965 39.6% 59.6% 122,492
Sacramento Capitol Park /Del Paso Heights /Downtown /Gardenland /North Sacramento 74.5 986.7 5,412 43.2% 47.4% 132,800
Kern Alta Sierra /Bodfish /Glennville /Kernville /Lake Isabella /Weldon /Wofford Heights 74.5 1,113.3 1,573 43.8% 49.9% 15,346
Kern Bakersfield Northeast /Oildale 74.5 1,010.9 5,175 34.1% 50.3% 110,822
Los Angeles Lake Los Angeles 74.3 981.1 807 40.6% 63.4% 18,283
Los Angeles Lancaster Central /Palmdale North Central 74.0 992.9 4,418 41.6% 55.3% 106,575
Kern Bakersfield East /Lakeview /La Loma 73.9 969.1 5,126 55.1% 73.3% 141,811
San Bernardino Muscoy /San Bernardino Central 73.8 1,010.4 4,787 45.8% 64.3% 125,799
San Bernardino Barstow /Daggett /Lenwood /Nebo Center /Oro Grande /Yermo 73.4 1,050.7 2,940 37.4% 48.8% 52,374
Lake Clearlake /Clearlake Oaks 72.3 1,309.0 1,498 43.1% 54.3% 19,368

8.3 County level social determinants and life expectancy, 2016-2020

  • These maps indicate that at the county level poverty, education, and life expectancy are ecologically roughly correlated. The many observed exceptions to this correlation indicate the need for further in-depth analysis.

9 Progress Indicators

  • Let’s Get Healthy California – the state health improvement plan (SHIP) – lays out a set of shared priorities and an overarching framework for measuring progress in improving the health and wellbeing of California. These priorities are cross-cutting in nature and are meant to engage across sectors, the priorities and indicators are not meant to be exhaustive, but rather reflect topical areas of focus where taking collective action across sectors could have a significant increase in impact.

  • The LGHC framework includes population and system level indicators from a range of data sources (e.g., births and deaths, emergency department and hospitalizations, survey, etc.). For more information about these indicators visit the LGHC Progress Dashboard. Technical details and limitations for each data source can be found in the metadata on each respective indicator page.


9.1 Healthy Beginnings

Indicator Measure Baseline Baseline Year Current Rate Current Rate Year Target Trend Progress
Priority Focus Area: Maternal and Infant Health
Breast Feeding Featured Topic: % of women with a live birth exclusively breast feeding 3 months after delivery 27.4% 2013-2014 32.6% 2015-2016
Infant Mortality # of deaths per 1,000 live births 4.9 2010 4.2 2017 4
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Cesarean Births % of cesarean births among low-risk, first time mothers 27.0% 2012 23.4% 2018 23.9%
Improving
Child Vaccination % children ages 19-35 months who have received all doses of recommended vaccines 54.1% 2010 68.6% 2017 80.0%
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Well-Woman Visit % of women ages 18-44 with a past year preventive medical visit 61.0% 2012 65.5% 2018 TBD
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Priority Focus Area: Prevention and Health Promotion
Childhood Overweight or Obese % of 5th graders assessed as overweight or obese using BMI data from FITNESSGRAM 40.5% 2013 40.1% 2017 TBD
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Childhood Overweight or Obese % of 7th graders assessed as overweight or obese using BMI data from FITNESSGRAM 37.2% 2013 38.2% 2017 TBD
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Childhood Overweight or Obese % of 9th graders assessed as overweight or obese using BMI data from FITNESSGRAM 34.5% 2013 36.1% 2017 TBD
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Childhood Fitness % of 5th grader who score 6 of 6 on FITNESSGRAM test 25.2% 2010-2011 23.1% 2019 36.0%
Getting Worse
Childhood Fitness % of 7th graders who score 6 of 6 on FITNESSGRAM test 32.1% 2010-2011 28.2% 2019 46.0%
Getting Worse
Childhood Fitness % of 9th graders who score 6 of 6 on FITNESSGRAM test 36.8% 2010-2011 33.0% 2019 52.0%
Getting Worse
Adolescent Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption % of 12 to 17 year olds who drank ≥ 2 sugary drinks yesterday 27.3% 2009 29.4% 2016 17.0%
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Adolescent Fruit and Vegetable Consumption % of 12 to 17 year olds who reported consuming fruits and vegetables ≥5 times yesterday 19.9% 2009 24.0% 2018 32.0%
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Childhood Asthma ED Visits # of emergency department visits due to asthma per 10,000 children and adolescents 75.3 2016 63.4 2019 28
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Adolescent Tobacco Use % of 12 to 17 year olds who smoked cigarettes in the past 30 days prior to the survey 13.8% 2009-2010 4.3% 2015-2016 10.0%
Improving
Priority Focus Area: Early Childhood Development and Resiliency
Child Maltreatment # of substantiated allegations of child maltreatment per 1,000 children 9 2011 7.5 2019 3
Improving
Early Reading Levels % children reading ≥ 3rd grade proficient level 37.0% 2015 48.5% 2019 60.0%
Improving
Depression-Related Feelings % of 7th graders who reported experiencing sad or hopeless feelings within the past year 28.0% 2008-2010 30.4% 2017-2019 25.0%
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Depression-Related Feelings % of 9th graders who reported experiencing sad or hopeless feelings within the past year 31.0% 2008-2010 32.6% 2017-2019 24.0%
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Depression-Related Feelings % of 11th graders who reported experiencing sad or hopeless feelings within the past year 32.0% 2008-2010 36.6% 2017-2019 27.0%
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Children with Adverse Childhood Experiences - Parent Reported % of children who have experienced two or more adverse experiences 36.0% 2016-2019 36.0% 2016-2019 TBD
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Prevalence of Adverse Childhood Experiences - Adult Retrospective % of adults having reported experiencing one or more adverse childhood experience before the age of 18 59.0% 2008-2009 63.5% 2015 45.0%
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
School Readiness Existing Indicator Under Development TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
TBD
Data Gap/Pending

9.2 Living Well

Indicator Measure Baseline Baseline Year Current Rate Current Rate Year Target Trend Progress
Priority Focus Area: Prevention and Health Promotion
Adult Obesity % of adults who are currently obese [BMI ≥30] 22.7% 2009 27.1% 2018 11.0%
Getting Worse
Adult Physical Activity % of adults meeting Aerobic Physical Activity guidelines in California 69.1% 2013 70.5% 2017 77.0%
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Adult Sugary Beverage Consumption % of adults who drank ≥ 2 sugary drinks yesterday 7.1% 2013 7.8% 2015 3.6%
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Adult Fruit and Vegetable Consumption % of adults who reported consuming fruits and vegetables ≥ 5 times yesterday 28.0% 2009 TBD TBD 34.0%
TBD
Data Gap/Pending
Adult Tobacco Use % of adults who are current smokers 12.7% 2012 9.7% 2018 9.0%
Improving
Diabetes Prevalence # of adults diagnosed with diabetes per 100 adults 9.2 2012 10.4 2018 7
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Priority Focus Area: Mental and Behavioral Health
Suicide # of suicides per 100,000 people 10 2010 10.6 2019 TBD
Getting Worse
Adult Depression % of adults who were told by a health professional they had a depressive disorder 11.7% 2012 17.8% 2018 No increase in prevalence compared to baseline
Getting Worse
Substance Use - 7th Graders % of 7th grader who reported having used alcohol or drugs in past month 10.4% 2013-2015 6.9% 2017-2019 TBD
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Substance Use - 9th Graders % of 9 grader who reported having used alcohol or drugs in past month 23.2% 2013-2015 14.6% 2017-2019 TBD
Improving
Substance Use - 11th Graders % of 11th grader who reported having used alcohol or drugs in past month 33.4% 2013-2015 23.2% 2017-2019 TBD
Improving
Substance Use - Non-Traditional % of non-traditional grade level students who reported having used alcohol or drugs in past month 60.2% 2013-2015 28.6% 2017-2019 TBD
Improving

9.3 Healthy Aging

Indicator Measure Baseline Baseline Year Current Rate Current Rate Year Target Trend Progress
Priority Focus Area: Healthy Aging
Adult Maltreatment New Indicator: Under Development TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
TBD
Data Gap/Pending
Cognitive Difficulty New Indicator: Under Development TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
TBD
Data Gap/Pending
Older Adult Falls New Indicator: Under Development TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
TBD
Data Gap/Pending
Disability / Activities of Daily Living New Indicator: Under Development TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
TBD
Data Gap/Pending

9.4 Redesigning the Health System

Indicator Measure Baseline Baseline Year Current Rate Current Rate Year Target Trend Progress
Priority Focus Area: Access, Availability, and Utilization of Health Services
Health Professional Shortage Area % of California Communities designated as a primary care shortage area [1 Primary Care Physician FTE per 2000 people] 44.8 2018 44.8 2018 TBD
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Timely Care - Primary Care % of patients receiving care in a timely manner 54.1% 2012 57.3% 2018 78.0%
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Timely Care - Specialty Care % of patients receiving care in a timely manner 58.1% 2012 61.2% 2018 78.0%
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Care Proxy: % of patients reporting difficulty understanding their provider 3.5% 2009 3.6% 2018 2.5%
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Priority Focus Area: High Quality, Patient Centered Care
Preventable Hospitalizations # of preventable hospitalizations per 100,000 population 1049 2016 889 2019 727
Improving
Coordinated Outpatient Care % of patients whose doctor’s office helps coordinate their care with other providers or services 67.0% 2011 62.9% 2018 94.0%
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Hospital Readmissions # and unadjusted rate for all-cause, unplanned, 30-day inpatient readmissions in California hospitals 14.5% 2016 14.9% 2019 11.9%
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Hospital Acquired Conditions # of measureable hospital-acquired conditions per 1,000 discharges 0.76 2011 0.85 2019 0.5
Improving
Priority Focus Area: End of Life
Advanced Care Planning Existing Indicator: Under Development TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
TBD
Data Gap/Pending
Access to Hospital Based Palliative Care % of California hospitals that provide in-patient palliative care. This indicator will be revised 37.3% 2012 48.4% 2016 80.0%
Improving
Use of Hospice % of decedents with terminal conditions that utilized hospice care. This indicator will be revised 39.0% 2010 43.3% 2014 54.0%
Improving
Deaths in Hospital % of terminal hospital stays that include intensive care unit days. This indicator will be revised 22.0% 2010 21.0% 2012 17.0%
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change

9.5 Creating Healthy Communities

Indicator Measure Baseline Baseline Year Current Rate Current Rate Year Target Trend Progress
Priority Focus Area: Inclusive Economic Prosperity
Poverty % of California residents living in poverty based on the California Poverty Measure 17.8% 2017 16.4% 2019 TBD
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Unemployment Rate % of the total labor force that is unemployed 11.7% 2011 4.2% 2018 TBD
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Food Access - Food Insecurity New Indicator: Under Development TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
TBD
Data Gap/Pending
Priority Focus Area: Housing and Homelessness
Homelessness New Featured Topic: Under Development TBD TBD TBD TBD
Housing - Cost Burden New Indicator: Under Development TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
TBD
Data Gap/Pending
Priority Focus Area: Neighborhood Safety and Collective Efficacy
Community Safety - Violent Crime Rate # of violent crimes per 100,000 population 423.1 2012 447.4 2018 TBD
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Community Safety - Perception of Neighborhood Safety % of adults who report they feel safe in their neighborhoods all or most of the time 92.4% 2007 88.7% 2018 96.0%
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Community Support % reporting people in the neighborhood are willing to help each other TBD TBD 84.5% 2017 TBD
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Volunteering New Indicator: Under Development TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
TBD
Data Gap/Pending
Civic Engagement / Voting New Indicator: Under Development TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
TBD
Data Gap/Pending
Internet Acces New Indicator: Under Development TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
TBD
Data Gap/Pending
Priority Focus Area: Accessible Built Environment
Food Access - Healthy Retail Food Outlets % of all food retailers that are health food retailers 17.9% 2017 17.9% 2017 TBD
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Food Access - Access to Fruit and Vegetables % of adults that reported being able to find fresh fruits and vegetables in their neighborhood. This indicator will be revised. 78.9% 2011 89.0% 2018 88.0%
Improving
Transportation - Alternate Mode of Commute % of adults who report walking, biking, or transit to work. Modified Indicator: Under Development TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
TBD
Data Gap/Pending
Transportation - Commute Time % of adults who drive alone >30 minutes to work. Modified Indicator: Under Development TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
TBD
Data Gap/Pending
Park Access New Indicator: Under Development TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
TBD
Data Gap/Pending
Priority Focus Area: Environmental Quality & Climate Change
Pollution: Air and Water Quality New Indicator: Under Development TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
TBD
Data Gap/Pending
Climate Change: Drought / Precipitation, Heat Days, Wildfries [acreage burned, smoke exposure, displacement New Indicator: Under Development TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
TBD
Data Gap/Pending

9.6 Lowering the Cost of Care

Indicator Measure Baseline Baseline Year Current Rate Current Rate Year Target Trend Progress
Priority Focus Area: Healthcare Coverage and Affordability
Uninsurance - For a Year or More % of respondents who reported being without health insurance for a year or more 11.3% 2009 5.7% 2019 4.0%
Improving
Uninsurance - Some Point in the Past Year % of respondents who reported being without insurance at some point in past 12 months 8.7% 2009 3.0% 2019 3.0%
Improving
Uninsurance - Point in Time % of respondents who reported being without insurance at the time of the survey 14.5% 2009 7.2% 2019 5.0%
Improving
Total Out of Pocket Cost, Individuals Costs exclude over-the-counter medications but include family expenses for premiums, copays, deductibles, and co-insurance for services and prescription drugs $894 2012 $834 2018 TBD
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Total Out of Pocket Cost, Families Costs exclude over-the-counter medications but include family expenses for premiums, copays, deductibles, and co-insurance for services and prescription drugs $6884 2012 $7545 2018 TBD
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Bending the Health Care Cost Curve Compound Annual Growth Rate, or CAGR by total health expenditures and per capita costs Total: 7% (Per Capita: 6% GSP: 4%) 2012 5.5% 2015 No greater than CAGR for GSP
↔︎
Little or No Detectable Change
Care in an Integrated System % of Californians who receive care in an integrated system, defined as a Health Maintenance Organization tracked by the Department of Managed Health Care 50.9% 2013 59.8% 2018 63.9%
Improving
Policies that Reward Value-Based Payment Existing Indicator: Under Development TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
TBD
Data Gap/Pending
Transparent Information on Cost and Quality of Care Existing Indicator: Under Development TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
TBD
Data Gap/Pending

9.7 Overarching Indicators

Indicator Measure Baseline Baseline Year Current Rate Current Rate Year Target Trend Progress
Priority Focus Area: Equitable Outcomes
Life Expectancy / Premature Death New Indicator: Under Development TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
TBD
Data Gap/Pending
Overall Health Status: Adults % of adults who report very good or excellent health 51.8% 2009 46.1% 2018 60.0%
Getting Worse

Appendix

A - Rankings

A.1 Public Health Level Ranking of Decreases in Death Rates, 2010 to 2020

*Conditions with fewer than 100 deaths in either period are excluded. Such conditions with large percent decreases include:
Meningitis: 40.50% decrease in age-adjusted death rate from 2010 (75 deaths) to 2020 (52 deaths)
Sickle cell disorders and trait: 34.70% decrease in age-adjusted death rate from 2010 (40 deaths) to 2020 (29 deaths)

A.2 Ranking of Years Lived with Disability, 2019

A.3 Ranking of Number of Hospitalizations by Condition, 2020

A.4 Ranking of Number of Emergency Department Visits by Condition, 2020

A.5 Public Health Level Number of Deaths by Top Level, 2020

B - Tables

B.1 Top Public Health Level Conditions – 2009, 2019 and 2020 deaths, rates, and 10-year and 1-year Increases in Death Rates

*Conditions with fewer than 100 deaths in any period (2010, 2019, 2020) are excluded.

B.2 All-cause death rates, and rate ratios in 2018-2020: AI/AN, Asian, Black, Latino, NH/PI, White

  • This table compares deaths at different age levels across race/ethnicity groups. It displays the age-specific number and rate for all-cause deaths for racial/ethnic groups, based on 2018-2020 data. Shading is included in the background of these columns to reflect magnitude and proportion.

    Total crude death rate and the age-adjusted rate are also shown at the bottom of the table for each racial/ethnic group.
Age Group AIAN Deaths Asian Deaths Black Deaths Latino Deaths NHPI Deaths White Deaths AIAN Rate Asian Rate Black Rate Latino Rate NHPI Rate White Rate AIAN White Rate Ratio Asian White Rate Ratio Black White Rate Ratio Latino White Rate Ratio NHPI White Rate Ratio
0 - 4 * 510 703 3301 28 1346 * 60.1 190.9 100.7 127.2 60.1 * 1.00 3.18 1.68 2.12
5 - 14 * 126 137 774 11 350 * 7.7 16.9 9.9 21.9 8.1 * 0.95 2.09 1.22 2.70
15 - 24 70 561 1069 4805 46 2436 96.7 29.4 102.4 57.5 73.1 48.1 2.01 0.61 2.13 1.20 1.52
25 - 34 141 1175 2105 7664 128 6240 208.5 61.4 213.1 109.8 195.4 123.1 1.69 0.50 1.73 0.89 1.59
35 - 44 221 2055 2900 10024 190 8803 351.3 89.8 335.2 151.8 298.9 160.1 2.19 0.56 2.09 0.95 1.87
45 - 54 417 4299 5476 17354 422 19705 639.8 185.9 605.6 296.0 717.2 337.0 1.90 0.55 1.80 0.88 2.13
55 - 64 822 8993 12547 28858 641 54077 1094.0 433.2 1375.7 682.2 1173.2 757.2 1.44 0.57 1.82 0.90 1.55
65 - 74 906 14697 14624 33133 763 89947 1690.5 954.4 2576.1 1436.6 2335.3 1505.1 1.12 0.63 1.71 0.95 1.55
75 - 84 881 21569 13787 35833 656 120903 3713.5 2712.4 5057.1 3464.3 4420.5 3868.2 0.96 0.70 1.31 0.90 1.14
85+ 710 34159 12699 43099 490 187099 8420.3 9747.3 13172.6 10748.8 10090.6 13635.4 0.62 0.71 0.97 0.79 0.74
Total - Crude 4209 88144 66047 184845 3375 490906 813.0 562.7 967.1 394.5 784.8 1075.0 0.76 0.52 0.90 0.37 0.73
Total - Age Adjusted 699.0 431.0 916.1 572.3 805.2 650.5 1.07 0.66 1.41 0.88 1.24

*Data are suppressed per the California Health and Human Services Agency Data De-Identification Guidelines

C - Exploratory

Technical Notes 

Data Sources 

A majority of the charts and tables in this module are based on death data: 

  • The death data used are from the California Integrated Vital Records (CalIVRS) system, based on death certificates/reports transmitted to the California Department of Public Health, Center for Health Statistics and Informatics (CHSI).  Details of the exact data sets used, aggregation of International Classification of Disease 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes into causes of death, calculation methods, demographic and geographic detail, data de-identification, and a wide range of other particulars are available in the Technical Documentation section of the California Community Burden of Disease Engine (CCB-Tech)

    • Currently, only the single underlying cause of death ICD-10 code is used–future versions of this Core Module will incorporate “multiple cause of death”  codes for some conditions. 

    • All measures using vital statistics death data are limited based on the accuracy of the coding of cause of death on the death certificate 

Other data used include: 

  • Hospital inpatient discharges and Emergency Department encounters, from the California Department of Health Care Access and Information (HCAI). Details of the exact data are in the CCB-TECH. 

  • Reportable infectious disease data, from the CDPH Center for Infectious Disease, obtained via the CHHS Open Data Portal

  • Disability and risk data and charts from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME),  downloaded or directly extracted as images from their website

  • Social determinants of health data from the US Census American Community Survey

  • And, a wide range of Let’s Get Healthy California Progress Indicators, from multiple sources. 

Measures 

Primary measures used with death data include number of deaths, crude death rate, age-adjusted death rate, and life expectancy

  • Number of deaths (or hospitalizations, etc.) describes the absolute magnitude of deaths, and is a clear and easily understood measure. All other things being equal, the number of deaths will be larger in areas with larger populations. This measure does not take into account the “age distribution” or size of the population.  

  • Crude Death Rate takes the size of the population into account by dividing the number of deaths by the number of people in the population (multiplied by 100,000 for interpretability, i.e. number of deaths per 100,000 people).  

  • Age-adjusted Death Rate takes into account or “controls” for the age distribution of the population where the rate is being assessed. It is the rate that would have existed if the population had the same age distribution as a reference population. This allows for comparisons between populations with differences in age distributions, accounting for the fact that age itself is generally correlated with higher mortality. 

  • Life Expectancy (specifically, “Life Expectancy at Birth”) is a familiar and widely used measure, which summarizes in one number the ‘force of mortality’ in a population, and provides a valuable single measure to compare the overall health status between populations. Its calculation is complex, but is generally interpreted as the number of years people born in a particular year are “likely” to live. 

In addition to these measures, a number of other measures are used, specifically in the “Multiple Lenses” section and other ranking charts. Explanations of these measures are:  

  • Premature Deaths: Years of Life Lost (YLL) emphasizes the impact of conditions that cause more deaths among younger people, so YLL is sometimes referred to as “premature deaths”. The number of years of life lost for deaths at each age are determined here using the “Global Burden of Disease” methods from the World Health Organization. Years of Life Lost are expressed here as rates per 100,000 population. 

  • Percent Increase measures the change in the death rate between two different years, and shows which conditions are increasing (or decreasing) most rapidly. This is measured by showing the percentage increase in the age-adjusted death rate. “Age-adjusted” death rates are used to account for the impact of the changing age distribution of the California population on the measure. Because this measure focuses on the degree of increase it may sometimes highlight a condition or group for which the absolute number of deaths is relatively small, but the percent increase is great. 

  • Disparity Ratio  measures the difference in the death rate between racial/ethnic groups for the same condition using combined data from a three-year period. The measure compares the age-adjusted death rate in the group with the highest rate to the group with the lowest rate. A large ratio between the two rates indicates a large disparity. 

  • Years Lived with Disability is based on calculations and modeling done by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. These models utilize assumptions and multiple data sources to produce reliable California-specific estimates of years lived with disability. (expressed here as rate per 100,000 population, most recent year available 

Data Time Frames  

  • This 2022 Core Module generally includes data through the most recent year for which complete data are available, 2020. For some charts data for just 2020 are shown and for others, mainly the trend charts, data for 2000 through 2020 are shown. 

  • In some cases, for statistical stability and/or data deidentification purposes, years are aggregated into 3- or 5-year groups. 

  • Because of the importance of showing some high-level data for the most recent time period available, especially in this COVID-19 era, data for 2021 are included in the 4th section. These data are preliminary—final death data for a given year are not available until the fall of the following year. 

Additional Notes 

  • The data and charts in the Core Module are primarily driven by The California Community Burden of Disease Engine (CCB).  The CCB is a dynamic system of morbidity, mortality, and social determinants of health data;  standard value sets and tools; and modular code,  using R. The CCB provides a detailed interactive visualization platform for discovery and deeper understanding of health outcomes for public health action; and resources to quickly identify and address emerging issues and questions, with rapid deployment of analyses, visualizations, and other data tools and resources, accessible for use by public health practitioners and partners. 

    • The death and hospitalization data in the Core Module use the CCB data processing, measure calculation, and data visualization machinery. Key aspects of the CCB that facilitate insights in the Core Module include the California Community Burden of Disease Condition List, a hierarchical list of about 70 causes of death, that allow for both broad and detailed views mortality burden; hierarchical views of place, including the state, county, community and census tract levels; over 20 years of data; and carefully constructed measures and formulas.  Details of these features are described in the CCB-Tech. 
  • The “Medical Service Study Area (MSSA)” geographic unit is used in several places in the report to represent “community”.  MSSAs are aggregations of census tracts, and are constructed by the HCAI with each decennial census. MSSAs are a useful surrogate for “communities” because there are 542 MSSAs for the 2010 census, providing much more geographic granularity than the 58 California counties and much greater numerical/statistical stability than the 8000+ California 2010 census tracts. Further, they are aligned with “communities” in the important sense of geographic, cultural, and sociodemographic similarities (although this is generally more true for urban than rural MSSAs, because of the larger size of MSSAs in rural areas). 

  • Grouping of ICD-10 cause of death codes into useful categories is described in detail in the CCB-Tech. Because of their visibility in this Core Module and because their construction may differ from that used in other reports of California death data, we note that:  

    • “Drug overdose” deaths include “accidental poisonings by drugs” codes, “substance use disorder codes” (but not “alcohol use disorder”), and “newborn (suspected to be) affected by maternal use of drugs of addiction” codes. This approach was determined based on discussion with the CDPH Substance and Addition Prevention Branch (SAPB) and on the CDC “Consensus Recommendations for National and State Poisoning Surveillance”. 

    • “Alcohol-related conditions” includes customary causes like “alcohol abuse” and “alcohol dependence disorder”, as well as conditions that may be grouped elsewhere in other systems, especially “Alcoholic liver disease”. This approach was determined based on discussion with the CDPH Injury and Violence Prevention Branch (IVPB) and on the CDC Alcohol-Related Disease Impact (ARDI) ICD-10 codes (using 100% Alcohol-attributable codes only).